An alternative media article about 9/11
from The San Francisco Bay Guardian, which went beyond the usual
knee-jerk 'conspiracy nuts' angle, noted that:
" As the public reached its pinnacle of being open to considering
alternative views of 9/11, the truth movement fractured into disparate
subgroups, each pushing its own pet theories, torn by internal
divisions over strategy, and unable to mount a cohesive strategy
that would break through the din of election-year politics."
This fracturing was, of course delberately engineered by the disinfo
agents in the 9/11 movement. Indeed, the 'splits' were a carefully
planned and integral part of the coverup from the start. The establishment
has been actively 'managing' the 9/11 skeptics all the while -with
a focussed plan which relied opon the guaranteed reelection of
G.W. Bush.
A 9/11 movement was inevitable. When it arose, the establishment
was there in advance, waiting for it with open arms. Many genuine
people play key roles in the 9/11 movement, but are outnumbered
by the operatives. 'Management' of the aftermath was always integral
to the plot, and was likely resourced more heavily than the attack
scenario itself..... Read
On
|
Most
9/11 conspiracy theories are crazy, because intelligence agencies
